Skip to main content
Safety of Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Malignancy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Hall, J. C., Lozko, Y., Hui, C., Baniel, C. C., Snyder, J. M., Vitzthum, L., Chang, D. T., Rahimy, E., Pollom, E. 2023; 117 (2S): e300

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been considered a relative contraindication to radiation therapy (RT) due to the potential greater risk of RT-induced toxicities, however, there is limited toxicity data using modern RT techniques. This study aims to assess toxicity outcomes in patients with IBD treated with abdominal or pelvic RT.MATERIALS/METHODS: After institutional review board approval, patients with IBD who received RT to the abdomen or pelvis were filtered from an institutional research repository and their electronic medical records were reviewed. Acute toxicity was defined as that occurring within 3 months of RT. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess rates of grade =2 toxicity-free survival.RESULTS: We identified 62 patients with median age of 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 62-77) who received RT from 2006-2022. Median follow up was 15 months (IQR 4-33). Most patients were male (42; 68%) and had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (44; 71%). The most common primary malignancy was colorectal/anal (26; 42%). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was most frequently used (38; 61%) followed by 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) (12; 19%) and stereotactic body RT (SBRT)/brachytherapy (12; 19%). For IMRT/3D-CRT, median dose delivered was 50 Gy (IQR 49-59) in 25 fractions (IQR 25-30), and median maximum dose (Dmax) to bowel was 48 Gy (IQR 43-52); whereas for SBRT/brachytherapy, the median dose was 32 Gy (IQR 27-40) in 3 fractions (IQR 2-5) and median bowel Dmax was 32 Gy (IQR 20-37). The median biologically effective dose delivered with an assumed alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED10) across all RT modalities was 63 Gy (IQR 60-72). After initiation of RT, 31 patients (50%) and 14 patients (23%) experienced grade =2 acute and late toxicity, respectively. Thirteen patients (21%) and 7 patients (11%) experienced grade 3 acute and late toxicity, respectively. No patients experienced grade >3 toxicity. Acute toxicity resulted in interruption to RT for 5 patients (8%), 2 of which did not resume RT. Four patients (6%) required adjustment to chemotherapy or IBD medication dosage as a result of their acute toxicity. Median time from RT start to acute toxicity onset was 41 days (IQR 32-46), whereas median time to onset of late toxicity was 9 months (IQR 5-15). The most common acute and late toxicities were diarrhea (21; 34%) and bowel obstruction/perforation/fistula (4; 6%), respectively. Rates of grade =2 toxicity-free survival overtime were not significantly associated with IBD status (active vs quiescent), delivered BED10, or bowel Dmax BED3.CONCLUSION: In patients with IBD treated with abdominal or pelvic RT for malignancy, RT was feasible with acceptable rates of toxicity and active versus quiescent IBD status did not impact toxicity outcomes. Future research is needed to elucidate specific dose constraints when treating patients with IBD.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2314

View details for PubMedID 37785098