Abstract

BACKGROUND: The foundation for a successful academic surgical career begins in medical school. We examined whether attending a top-ranked medical school is correlated with enhanced research productivity and faster career advancement among academic cardiothoracic (CT) surgeons.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research profiles and professional histories were obtained from publicly available sources for all CT surgery faculty at accredited US CT surgery teaching hospitals in 2018 (n=992). We focused on surgeons who completed medical school in the United States during or after 1990, the first-year US News & World Report released its annual medical school research rankings (n=451). Subanalyses focused on surgeons who completed a research fellowship (n=299) and those who did not (n=152).RESULTS: A total of 124 surgeons (27.5%) attended a US News & World Report top 10 medical school, whereas 327 (72.5%) did not. Surgeons who studied at a top 10 medical school published more articles per year as an attending surgeon (3.2 versus 1.9; P<0.0001), leading to more total publications (51.5 versus 27.0; P<0.0001) and a higher H-index (16.0 versus 11.0; P<0.0001) over a similar career duration (11.0 versus 10.0y; P=0.1294). These differences in career-long research productivity were statistically significant regardless of whether the surgeons completed a research fellowship or not. The surgeons in both groups, however, required a similar number of years to reach associate professor rank (P=0.6993) and full professor rank (P=0.7811) after starting their first attending job.CONCLUSIONS: Attending a top-ranked medical school is associated with enhanced future research productivity but not with faster career advancement in academic CT surgery.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.008

View details for PubMedID 33794390